Skip to main content

JUDGE IN AFOIA CASE INVOLVING FAILURE OF FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS REFUSAL TO RELEASE RECORDS RELUCTANT TO MAKE RULING - TAKES MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT



Yesterday, a special judge, a lawyer hired to represent the Fayetteville Public School district and our self-represented, non-attorney publisher all made a trip to Fayetteville for a hearing regarding our publisher's denial of rights under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act by the Fayetteville Public School ("FPS") district.



The judge trekked up Hwy 71 from Ashdown and our publisher and the FPS outside council traveled separately from Little Rock for what will probably end up being a precedent setting case regarding the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act.

Our publisher made a FOI request to FPS on June 19th. FPS failed to follow the statutory provisions of the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act and even after the Arkansas Attorney General issued two opinions favoring the release of the requested information, FPS refused to do so even thought they believed the documents to be public records.



Under the AFOIA, the district's refusal to provide the requested public records to our publisher is a denial of his rights under the AFOIA. 

This is how a FOI request is supposed to be handled in Arkansas.

1.  A request is received for documents under the AFOIA and must respond promptly, no later that three working days and do one of the following:
(a)  grant the request in full and release the records,
(b) grant the request in part and release some of the records, or disclose records with exempt portions deleted;
(c)  deny the request in its entirety;
(d)  state the records do not exist or that they are not in the agency;s possession;
(e) do nothing.

2.  The agency has 24 hours to determine if the records sought are subject to release under the AFOIA. 

3. Within that 24 hour period, the agency has to immediately notify the subject(s) of the request so that if they object to the release, they can seek an opinion from the Arkansas Attorney General regarding the agencies intent to release the records.

4. If an opinion is sought from the Attorney General, the Attorney General has three days to issue the opinion.

The timeline above shows how the FPS outside council failed to adhere to the law and violated our publisher's rights under the AFOIA after the AG issued two opinions that the records were releasable yet failed to release to records upon demand. 

It was also clearly detailed in the complaint he filed.  You can view it by clicking here.

In the hearing Judge Cooper started off complementing our publisher on the complaint he filed. Judge Cooper remarked that he had looked for a bar number under the publisher's signature but did not see one. Judge Cooper asked our publisher if he was an attorney and seemed surprised when he stated he was not.

Our publisher stated that the complaint and exhibits showed with a preponderance of the evidence that FPS and their outside council had violated his rights and the process of the AFOIA in the matter before the Court. 

He detailed that the public interest in the release of the records outweighed the privacy rights of Shae Newman, who had filed a  "Jane Doe" lawsuit against FPS, in an attempt to stop the release of what FPS, the Attorney General and our publisher believed were releasable public records. 

This is what he stated tipped the scale in favor of the public interest:

The public interest in the disclosure of the documents far outweighs Shae Newman's, a.k.a, "Jane Doe", privacy interests.  First – her attorney, Suzanne Clark, leaked the letter to Chris Lawson to the press on April 2nd - presumably because she and Newman were not happy with the way the school district was handling the situation and wanted to put public pressure on the school district to act.  In that letter, she quotes from the texts and emails exchanged between her client and Dr. Wendt, references taped conversations, and other facts regarding the relationship.  Similarly, she  leaked her client’s EEOC statement to the press the Friday before Dr. Wendt’s hearing before the school board presumably to influence the public’s opinion without having her client, Shae Newman, appear at the hearing.  The statement is extremely detailed and quotes at length from the texts and email - but it is one sided.   If Newman was truly the victim, why not make all of the texts available so they can be read in context. She has put the information out in the public.  She should not be able to manipulate the publication of information when it suits her. 


Second - Clark's April 2nd letter references that some members of administration knew or suspected the relationship and did nothing.  The public has a right to know if this is true in order to determine if there is a systemic problem at the school district which would warrant further discipline and/or training.  The fact that she alleges Dr. Wendt slept with a board member is also something the public should know more about - especially since they renegotiated his contract in January and removed the morals clause.  The school district is now not only facing a lawsuit from Shae Newman, a.k.a., "Jane Doe", but one from Dr. Wendt.  


Third, there is a school board seat up for election in November.  The public is entitled to know the information so that it can make an informed decision in this election and whether action should be taken to remove other board members.  


Fourth, the cat is out of the bag.   Everyone knows that Shae Newman is "Jane Doe"  and has ever since she brought her complaint as evidenced by Clark's statement in her April 2nd letter that her client was getting questioned by the press and public. 


Fifth, the public is entitled to know why Dr. Wendt was not immediately suspended with pay pending an immediate investigation.  This goes to whether in house counsel, the inept Chris Lawson,   whose position was created by Dr. Wendt specifically for Chris Lawson,  -was derelict in his duty and should be disciplined as well as School Board Chair Justin Eichman.  Dr. Wendt presumably could have been harassing other employees during this time. 


Sixth, this is the third sex scandal in six years involving high ranking members of the school administration;  the superintendent, the head football coach, and the athletic director.   This indicates that there is a systemic problem at the school district which may warrant oversight by the Department of Education. 


Shae Newman, a.k.a., "Jane Doe", could have appealed the decision that the records are public.  She chose not to do so and purposefully filed a lawsuit for declaratory judgment (without asking for a TRO or preliminary injunction until hours before this case was to be heard) knowing that the declaratory judgment route would be dragged out.  Also,  it puts the school district in the position of having to defend its decision which it does not really have an interest in doing given it could mean more jobs lost and more lawsuits plus the embarrassment of how badly this whole thing was handled. 

WHAT EXACTLY IS NEWMAN TRYING TO HIDE ABOUT HER ADULTEROUS AFFAIR WITH HER BOSS?

Our publisher also questioned why if Newman was so bent on keeping her text messages secret and hidden had her attorney, Suzanne Clark, not presented an emergency ex parte petition for a TRO preventing release of the records with another judge in the Circuit since Judge Martin had been on vacation when her lawsuit against FPS was filed and would not be back until August 9th? 

That sort of thing happens all the time when a judge assigned to a case is sick or out of town when something pops up.

The outside counsel, Missy McJunkins Duke, hired due to in-house council Chris Lawson's ineptitude whined about her client, Superintendent John Colbert, not being served notice of the hearing.   

MISSY MCJUNKINS DUKE


The fact that she was present and representing Colbert showed that she had constructive notice even if service had not technically been satisfied.

Also present in the gallery and permitted to address the Court was a stand in for Suzanne Clark, the attorney for Shae Newman, a.k.a., "Jane Doe", Payton Bentley. 


THEY LEFT OUT THAT HE'S ALSO TRYING TO GROW A BEARD

Young Bentley was allowed to address the court as well, and he stated that our publisher should not have been allowed to have the hearing, that he should have filed as a party in Newman's lawsuit. 

What the heck you say? 

This little dude was allegedly a cum laude graduate of the second best law school in the state and he actually made that argument? 

Maybe he was out hiking when the AFOIA was being discussed in law school.

Our publisher exercised his rights under the AFOIA and used the only legal remedy available to him, one that is specifically granted in the law for dealing with failure of an agency to respond to a AFOIA request. 

Perhaps he should stick with hiking and watching the Razorbacks lose games like his partner Mrs. Clark will be losing Shae Newman's lawsuit against FPS and leave the lawyering to folks that know what's what like our publisher.

Maybe he should also check with his boss, Mrs. Clark, as she has filed a motion to objecting to just that suggestion and seeks to limit participants in the Newman/"Jane Doe" lawsuit.




Judge Cooper was reluctant to make a ruling Friday afternoon until after Judge Martin returns from vacation on Monday (August 6th) and look at the mess of filings Clark has made on behalf of her client Shae Newman who she listed as "Jane Doe" even though everyone in Fayetteville and all over the world knows is Shae Newman.

Judge Martin might recuse citing the fact that Judge Cooper has heard a companion case and for "judicial economy" pass the case onto him.


JUDGE DOUG MARTIN

Judge Cooper wanted to set another hearing for August 13th so that he could wait and see what action Judge Martin takes. 

Our publisher suggested that Judge Cooper take the matter under advisement and depending on the action Judge Martin takes, he could make a ruling without having to hold another hearing. Judge Cooper liked the suggestion and that's exactly what he did.
 
If Judge Cooper finds that our publishers rights were violated, our publisher can then file a criminal complaint against Duke and her client FPS Superintendent John Colbert.

The in-house counsel  for the FPS, Chris Lawson, is an inept idiot and the outside-counsel hired to represent the district, Missy McJunkins Duke, is much the same.  

The way that she handled the FOI request has resulted in a complaint being filed with the Arkansas Office of the Committee of Professional Conduct

Also at the hearing was the editor for the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Rusty Turner and reporter Ron Wood.

RUSTY TURNER - EDITOR OF NW ARDEMGAZ


During the hearing, Judge Cooper asked if anyone from the paper was present as they filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit filed by Newman against FPS.

Turner responded saying that their attorney was out of town. Judge Cooper asked if he wanted to address the Court and Turner said that he like our publisher favored release of the requested documents.

The paper ran a story this morning about the hearing.





The full article that appeared in the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette today can be viewed by clicking here.

Apparently the paper does not want to report what we have reported and just about everyone in Fayetteville knows, that "Jane Doe' is actually Shae Newman.

Maybe they are afraid Newman will sue them.  

We and our publisher hopes that she sues us. 

The discovery process in that case, if one is filed, will get at all the requested documents and more. 

Our publisher could subpoena her cellphone records, copies of all text messages, photos, videos and more.

Great blogging material.

This matter is far from being over. If Judge Cooper denies our publisher the documents and fails to make a finding as to whether or not FPS and their outside counsel Duke violated his rights under the AFOIA, an appeal is planned.

That appeal will could set a precedent for all other AFOIA cases.

That would be an even greater blog post.


Popular posts from this blog

PCSSD teacher caught up in pedophile scandal at Immanuel Baptist Church. Her relationship with a minor under investigation.

PCSSD teacher Reagan Gray is being investigated by LRPD Since December 10, 2023, The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette has published around 20 articles about Immanuel Baptist Church in Little Rock, AR and an ongoing scandal involving sexual abuse committed by adults upon children and the coverup of that abuse. Immanuel Baptist Church ("IBC") is perched on a hill near the intersection of Shackleford Road and West Markham Street in the western part of Little Rock overlooking Interstate I-430. Their campus includes the old Kroger store that they have converted into their City Center that they describe as " a ministry of Immanuel Baptist Church for the city. Our purpose is to establish environments that foster healthy, restorative relationships and opportunities to mobilize people to change their world." The most recent scandal at the church involves a Pulaski County Special School District ("PCSSD") teacher, Reagan Gray, who was involved in the music ministry at t...

Little Rock pastor takes his own life after complaint of sexually explict conduct with a minor child

On April 24, 2024, Tyce Michelle Scroggins found what she has described to authorities as "inappropriate text and pictures" on her husband's cellphone. The messages were between her husband, Michael Todd Scroggins, the senior pastor at Moody Chapel AME Church in Little Rock and a minor student at LISA Academy High School. Moody Chapel AME Church   An argument ensued about the text messages and Pastor Scroggins left the home. On April 25th, Mrs. Scroggins filed a report with the Little Rock Police Department about the text messages. She also notified LISA Academy administration. On April 28th, Mrs. Scroggins filed a missing person report with the Sherwood Police Department.  Sherwood Police put out an alert on social media.   On April 30th, Little Rock Police found Pastor Scroggins dead from an apparent self inflicted gunshot wound in his vehicle parked in the back parking lot of the church. Our LRPD sources say that it appeared that Pastor Scroggins had been dead several ...

England High School teacher caught having sex with a 18 year old former student in a car in a park

England High teacher Courtani Bell and former student Kaylin Sullivan   On Monday January 8, 2024 at around 6 p.m., an England, AR cop caught Courtani Bell (W/F 29) a teacher at England High School engaged in "public sexual indecency" in the back seat of Bell's car in a public park with a former student, Kaylin Sullivan (B/F 18).   Here's the police report.   The court date for the randy pair is set for February 22nd in England District Court. Bell is married (for the time being as a source says he's left her) and lives in Sheridan with her hubby Layton. Bell's cuckholded hubby works at the Sheridan Police Department as a cop.   Sullivan, will turn 19 in February 2024.   There are questions surrounding the commencement of their relationship and did it began when  Sullivan was a student? We reached out to the England School District for a comment. No response was received. ### Here's the police body camera footage of the arrest. Here's a shorter version...